Antagonism

This afternoon (Friday, Dec 11, 2015), I made a mistake that I feel I ought to take a moment to reflect on.  While engaging with a follower of pastor J.D. Hall of Pulpit and Pen, I made an error in how I represented pastor Hall.

I was reflecting on a series of comments Hall made to a woman in his comment feed regarding a post on his blog that she (a professional editor) felt was not properly cited.  Hall took a belligerent tone and made a series of inflammatory and derogatory statements to both the woman and her husband (for more details, see here).

I chose to engage the comments made by offering counterpoint.  That is, I quoted one of the abusive comments and attached my own work on Male Headship (link) to the post.  As a result of this, I found myself in dialogue with Hall’s followers.

It was during this exchange I referenced tweets Hall made.  In the tweets, Hall told the husband of the editor who tweeted him that he should “control his wife” and in another told him to “point her mouth elsewhere”.  It was the latter that became a point of controversy.

Given that Hall has a history of sexually charged rhetoric (see here), I made the assumption he was using double entendre here.  When someone asked what I meant, I explained in explicit form with medically appropriate language.

I was immediately met with a flurry of accusations that spanned the spectrum from “Liar and baiter” to “personally attacking Hall”.  While this was not my intent, I recognize I was not as graceful in my interpretation as I could have been.  I was confronted by alternate interpretations and realized that, while Hall’s comments were rude and abusive, my interpretation of his sexual motives were misguided.

I have deleted the tweet accordingly, offered a public apology to Hall on Twitter, as well as to his followers who took offense.  However, given the high standards to which I have sought to hold myself and the arguments with which I interact, I felt it important to admit my own misstep here as well.

I have always sought to be humble and charitable.  In this instance, I failed to give a brother in Christ the opportunity to explain his comment.  For that reason, I apologize to J.D. Hall, to his followers, and to my readers.

Reflection

I recently read a quote by Carolyn Custis James which seems appropriate at such a moment.

 As Christians, we have important work to do that goes beyond deciding which camp we’ll join. There are deeper, global questions that need asking. How does Jesus’ gospel speak into the lives of every man and boy with indestructible identity, meaning, purpose, and belonging that is bestowed on him at birth by his Creator? How does Jesus’ gospel radically transform what it means to be male or female? And how are we supposed to be joining forces to advance his kingdom?

 

 

 

Carolyn’s quote struck me as a profound reminder that there is a need to be careful in our rhetoric – to avoid antagonism.  There is a fine line between calling out abuses with sound, well-reasoned arguments and being confrontational and antagonistic.  While the latter was never my intention, I was nevertheless perceived as crossing that line.

I have always firmly believed that, when an offense is perceived it must be respectfully considered.  Even if intentions are different from perception, we must be willing to hear how our actions and words sometimes communicate in an unclear or ungracious way.

It is in reflecting on this I want to urge my readers to not follow in my mistake.  As such, I offer the following thoughts:

First, avoid ideological commitments which compete with your identity as a member of the body of Christ.  In this instance, I allowed a separate incident to cloud my judgment, and I unfairly stereotyped Hall’s statement.

As Christians, we are called to live lives above reproach.  We are called to carry our crosses in humility, to consider others before ourselves in imitation of Christ (Phil 2:1-11).  In this instance, I allowed a prejudice formed unintentionally to paint an exchange in an uncharitable fashion.

Which leads me to my next point, it is better to be Christ-like than to be right.  Often, it can be tempting to twist Scripture and manipulate the words of others to fit a narrative we want to be true.  In this case, I turned Hall’s actual comments into a Straw Man Argument.  This undermined my points on the abusive nature of Hall’s diatribe and instead put the focus on my failure.

We must always be careful to present the arguments and words of others in a charitable and accurate fashion.  Given my own writing on this in the past, I take no pride in the irony of my failure here.  But I do feel it is an excellent reminder that we are all flawed and sinful individuals.

We cannot allow any ideology to become so central to our thoughts that it causes us to fail to practice grace to our neighbor.  In reality, not only is Hall a neighbor in God’s image, he is a brother in Christ.  I may profoundly disagree with him, but I none the less owe him the respect due a fellow human being made in the image of God and seeking to conform to the image of Christ.

This brings me to my last observation:

 When we pursue the speck in another’s eye, we will inevitably discover a plank in our own (Matt 7:1-6)

In my haste to deliver a decisive blow to the thoughts of another person regarding Hall’s words, I chose to pursue the “killing blow” instead of dialogue and discussion.  This not only alienated and offended fellow believers, it took the focus off of abuse and the victim and instead put the blame on me.  Blame I well deserved none the less served as a distraction to a very important issue.

When standing up for victims, it is always important to be sure we are not being a distraction, intentionally or unintentionally colonizing and controlling their narrative and making ourselves the center of attention.  I failed at this in this instance.

Again, for these reasons, I offer an apology to all involved.

In closing, I am reminded more than ever we cannot truly demonstrate our love for God unless we first act in love towards our neighbors (Matt 12:28-34).

 

**Cover image from http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/dc6/Myo/dc6Myogc9.jpeg**

 

Carolyn Custis James’ Interview is in regards to her book Malestrom.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Antagonism

  1. Nate.
    I just came upon your blog and this particular post. Wow. What an encouragement in this age of aggressive posturing to read your humble intelligent words. Keep it up, bro. Your attitude is the correct one and a delight to find.

    Like

  2. But don’t let your apology negate the fact that he was wrong, abusive, belittling toward a professional speaking frim a position of expertise (thus revealing his own abysmal ignorance). I won’t call the man a moron. But he certainly acted like one, or worse.

    Like

    1. I have endeavored not to do that. That is why I included my paradigm for the way I read it. Also, in the twitter conversation, my apology allowed me to steer the conversation back to the actual abuse. Once that happened, JD’s caudre of defenders disbanded quickly.

      Like

      1. Nate,

        You are a decent intelligent man. I appreciate how articulate you are. That said, I wish I was where you are at, and I wish I had the education & smarts to express myself in a intelligent compelling way. FWIW at this point I cannot. My brain cells are limited, actually they have been that way for years. I just hope you will consider my inabilities when I go off, or rant, and or come off as confrontational and antagonistic.

        I am still reeling from being hoodwinked by the experts, the so called Pastors that I followed for over 20 some years. I am raw, and I really don’t give a rats ass at this point in leg of my journey if I am antagonists in my tweets. The Doug Wilson’s and company make me sick.

        Pray for me that I can come to a place of responding respectfully & with civility. Your humility in apologizing should be a lesson to all the spiritual bullies, celebrities, so called pastors on how to own their own failures. But I know it won’t make a dent,

        Like

        1. Thank you for your kind words. I never judge people for their hurt. I don’t fault you for being upset at all. And life is a journey, don’t sell yourself short. As one of favorite passages says, God uses the seemingly foolish and weak things of the world to shame entire systems of oppression (1 Cor 1-2). Do what you can and entrust the rest to God. You will be in my prayers. If you want me to pray by name, feel free to email me at nate.sparks130@gmail.com with your name and any requests. It would be my honor.

          Peace to you 🙂

          Like

Thanks for taking the time to read and engage. I look forward to your feedback, I welcome any criticism. However, as my goal here is mutualy respectful, beneficial conversation, I only ask that we keep civility in mind with our words. Grace and Peace.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s